Agent’s declaration sets forth his limited role in this matter. Bank of America also seems to allege it served a three day notice to vacate on the Defendants, though its allegations in this regard are disputed, uncertain and contradicted by other evidence. Bank of America will assert that it went through the proper foreclosure procedures to take back title to the property. Plaintiff Bank of America has brought this eviction action seeking to gain possession of the Defendants’ home following a purported foreclosure on the property.
#Sample motion in limine to exclude testimony trial
He should not be permitted to play a role in this trial inconsistent with his actual position in the matter, which, according to his own declaration, is only as the real estate agent hired to list and sell the property if Bank of America reclaims possession. Agent is not an employee of Bank of America, he was not involved in the foreclosure of the property, and he was not involved in service of any eviction notice.
Agent has no personal knowledge of relevant facts for this case. It has also come to our attention that lending institutions bringing eviction cases to court following evictions in this county are routinely showing up to trial with nothing more than a local real estate agent that has no actual personal knowledge of the underlying facts supporting the case.
Agent as their primary witness to establish the facts necessary to prevail in this action. Based on representations made by Plaintiff’s attorney, and by real estate agent REAL ESTATE AGENT himself, it is believed that Bank of America may try to rely on Mr. This is an eviction action brought by Bank of America following the foreclosure of the Defendants’ home.
0 kommentar(er)
